Hi there. Thanks for taking the time to have a read. I have to disagree with your assessment of the article however. I feel as if the title accurately captures what was conveyed in the body of the text. The fact of the matter is that the means to pay for a UBI already exist. My own personal ‘unique solutions or perspective’ are therefore inconsequential. I primarily sought to draw attention to the considerations policy/decision-makers would have to account for when implementing a UBI scheme and combine the different strands of thought on the issue into a cohesive piece. “How we can pay for a UBI” therefore seems to be a logical title. If I were offering a solution or idea that I myself had crafted, I may use something along the lines of “We need need to think differently about paying for a UBI”. Thanks again for reading.